Are SLCs the new MVPs?

Or is this just a dress with a belt?

I recently came across an article called I hate MVPs. So do your customers. Make it SLC instead.” In it, Jason Cohen advocates for replacing the concept of Minimum Viable Products (MVPs) with the concept of Simple Lovable Complete (SLC) products.

Cohen’s gripe is summed up in one sentence:

MVPs are too M and almost never V. Customers see that, and hate it.

Instead of shipping the minimum” thing, he says we ought to build something simple” and complete.” And customers should love using it too.

I’m writing about this because it’s a fascinating in-the-wild specimen of the Strawman Fallacy as well as example of New Clothes, two things that affect content designers all the time.

Strawman fallacy

The strawman fallacy (not to be confused with a straw man proposal), is where you create a clunky caricature of the idea you are trying to refute and attack that instead. A preferred tactic in strawmanning is the uncharitable interpretation of terminology, seen here:

…Google Docs was simple, but also complete. This is decidedly different from the classic MVP, which by definition isn’t complete (and in fact is embarrassing). Simple” is good, incomplete” is not.

Cohen positions MVPs as flawed because they are incomplete” (which makes them unlovable” and therefore something customers hate to use). Yes, MVPs are not complete” but critical to their nature is that they solve a problem pretty well.

Putting aside that Google kept adding to Google Docs (so it wasn’t complete” as Cohen says it was), he’s deliberately misinterpreting viable.”

The purpose of this maxim in the first place is to challenge teams to ship the smallest morsel of experience that delivers true value. That’s the hard part. Is figuring out what is viable.

Enter New Clothes

New Clothes is where you take some concept that is being interpreted in a way you don’t like, and rather than challenge the interpretation (or identify an actual problem), you come up with a fresh label and declare the old concept a hot mess. (See most rebrands.)

With MVPs and SLCs, he seems to be doing this:

Instead of Minimum” which sounds sad, let’s say Simple.” Fine, I don’t mind this, but minimum” never bothered me.

Next, instead of viable” which Cohen is choosing to interpret really narrowly, lets split that into two concepts: lovable and complete.

As a content designer, this raises all sorts of alarm bells for me. Cohen is framing this as a terminology problem, but it’s really an interpretation problem. It’s not that MVPs are bad, it’s that badly made MVPs are bad.

New words doesn’t always solve the issue

I’d argue that in this case, we’re worse off.

The concept of MVP was about navigating the tension between two competing forces: the need to be small (minimum) and the desire to be useful (viable).

Now we have three terms to interpret. So you have to ask, is this complete, simple, and lovable?” How is that easier? And is lovability” easier to target than viable”? (Brian De Haaff wrote a whole book on it and I was still a bit confused.)

In my humble opinion, this is reaching into the cabinet for New Clothes instead of solving the Real Problem.

Up next Work is like a hill I’m sick of the The double diamond model. A better metaphor to describe the plight of the average, overworked, over-meetinged knowledge worker comes I am a writer designer “I’m never going to explain that. When you do an artistic flourish like that, to describe it, to explain it, would just… invalidate the whole stroke
Latest posts The definitive post on whether chatGPT will take your job A Smallish Book about content design How to make Confluence less horrible I am a writer designer Are SLCs the new MVPs Work is like a hill Badge of dishonor Ceci n'est pas un poubelle This sign is a crime Beware the lure of consistency Do not water Never, ever use the term microcopy You need three things to design content Permanently fixed Assembly instructions for a side table Extraneous labels, ignored conventions The double diamond model Don't have an emergency here Product tours that don't suck Quickly edit text on the web How content designers can get the most out user interviews Let's be reasonable How to derisk trial experiences Turn around, bright eyes We could be zeroes Content design vs visual design The recipe approach to writing labels Sorry no pizza 6 truths for first-time public speakers Do not enter, exit only What the %&@! is content design